First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Zip Code:
All fields required.
Why do we want this?
We're asking for your zip code so we know what Congressional District you live in. We're trying to organize people in every district.

Yes We Can, and Yes We Will

26 Comments on “Yes We Can, and Yes We Will”

Joseph Watson Says:

There can be little doubt. Boone is the man with a great plan. And from the looks of things, the only reasonably comprehensive plan around. He knows his stuff and has the numbers to back up everything he says. But sometimes numbers do not always do the best job of communicating. I am reminded of a time when I was 60 years old. I was in the presence of a group of children ranging from about 4 to 12 years of age. I asked the littlest one how old she was. She held up 4 fingers to indicate that she was 4 years old. In order to communicate in those same simple graphic terms how old I was, I had 5 other children and myself hold up all of our fingers. To the little girl, that just seemed to be an immense number. To all the other kids, I could tell that it suddenly struck them just how old a 60-year old person really is because although they understood the number 60, it is not only understood but is much better felt when you see 60 fingers. To me, it suddenly struck home about just how old I was and it made me feel older than usual. But the real message in that story is that sometimes a graphic demonstration is the best way to communicate. So I have a suggestion for a TV spot for Mr. Pickens. I think he should show two large trucks that look essentially the same. He should report that they both just drove about a 10,000 mile circuit of the United States and they were both loaded with equal loads and that the loads are of typical size. He then reports that one truck is powered by diesel fuel. It cost a certain amount of money in fuel cost to make the trip and he presents a stack of one-dollar bills to demonstrate the cost. Then he reports that the second truck is powered by CNG and similarly demonstrates the fuel cost for that truck. Then he also shows how much each truck added to the air in the form of air pollution. Perhaps a block of graphite of appropriate size would be a good way to demonstrate how much carbon was added to the air by each truck. Then he shows two tanks of oil, reflecting how much of the diesel fuel came from our own reserves and how much came from OPEC. Then he shows a tank that demonstrates how much CNG came from our own reserves and another to show how much came from other contries. Is there even a second tank of CNG? Does the camera simply focus on a bare spot on the ground because there is none? In the background, we see wind turbines cranking out power from the wind. Perhaps we see some solar cell panels and we here an explanation of how these alternative sources and others can be used to free up the natural gas to power the trucks, eliminate much of the demand on foreign oil, improve air pollution, create technology and products that the rest of the world will want to buy from us, and create millions upon millions of jobs in the process. Perhaps a graphic representation of the appropriate millions of workers would serve to drive that number home. Perhaps that part might look something like those commercials for Verizon where they show all of those people that support their network except that the camera could just keep zooming out to reveal just how large of a group of people constitutes that many millions.

judith anaja Says:

I love this plan that Joseph Watson explains in his post. Let's get behind it and pass it on to Mr. Pickens. . How can we do that? It's great and will be very effective. Good luck

John Wesley Nobles Says:

Joseph Watson your idea is absolutely outstanding! Mr. Pickens should add it to his other marvelous videos. Please see that the Boss gets it.

Beau Roberts Says:

The Pickens Plan is an example of what used to drive America and made it into a great country-a logical and practical solution which uses our domestic resources and workers to (at least substantially) solve a great problem facing our nation. Unfortunately an idea that is simple and logical is rarely appreciated or acted on by our politicians. Why? Maybe it's as simple as they just don't like the fact that a businessman (an oilman, even worse) has come up with a credible strategy for reducing our dependence on foreign oil that they (both democrats and republicans) have failed for to do for decades. Just kind of makes them look bad. More likely though it is because they are being legally bribed by the corporations and people that stand to lose from it. Great changes always involve the transferring of economic and other forms of power from certain groups of people to others. It is unavoidable when technologies change, etc. But when our elected politicians get most of their campaign financing from corporations and PACs whose job it is to maintain the status quo, it is no wonder that we have not had a real energy strategy in this country for 30 years. Let's hope that the preview of $147 oil and the prospect of the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression is enough to wake up our "public servants" to the enormity and urgency of this issue

Ann Flaherty Says:

I too love Joseph's idea. It is so clear. Putting the facts out there in such a simple way that reaches everyone. Some will even call it an "Oh my gosh" moment. Seeing it this way, I can't imagine everyone wouldn't want to get on board and make this plan happen. All it takes is a spark. We can glow brightly using others oil or we can illuminate ourselves through American energy and American ingenuity. The choice is ours. I am on the side that America is still a great and resourceful country and I am betting on her and her people to shine the light of what true freedom really is. Independence, true independence from anyone or anything foreign, that includes foreign oil.

Joyce Meiser Says:

What a wonderful idea, Joseph! You are so correct that visual is sometimes the very best way to comprehend numbers. The only thing I would add to your plan, would be to visually show how many of those $$ spent on the diesel ended up in OPEC's pocket, versus how much of those $$ stayed home with the clean energy plan. Excellent! I'll be surprised if Boone hasn't already gotten his army working on that commercial!

peter kuhnle Says:

if we cancle oil debendency completely by changing from oil use to total electric, hydrogen, water hydraulic, waterfalls or any other means, that the use of oil. the middle east will dry up. we can use for cars our natural gas, or as mentioned above. also to save the enviroment, besides bleeding out to foreign companies, the car propulsion system has to be changed completely.

James Kelly Says:

Joe, Great idea and well described. I can hardly wait to see the ad. I can relate to his idea because I've always been a VISUAL learner. I think a lot of others are too. Boone, you need to listen to Joe and people like him that have good ideas. How about a Pickens Plan Think Tank? JPK

Kurt Goss Says:

A huge leap forward for CNG would be the inclusion in the federal government's stimulus plan - mandating a percentage of federal vehicles to use CNG. It would only take just one of our government entities, the United States Postal Service retrofitting their mail delivery vehicles to CNG. Every town in America would have a CNG outlet and imagine the number of jobs this would create domestically in the retrofit process, build out of CNG outlets and increased domestic production of natural gas. In addition, the reduction in oil used by this massive fleet, the reduced carbon emissions and what a great CNG marketing vehicle in every town across America. It is possible Obama's stimulus plan green team might be open to consider this and incorporate the concept if proposed by the Pickens Team. It certainly fits the criteria.

Lois McKenzie Says:

Joseph Watson has a great idea, aptly described and eloquently written. I hope it's used by the Pickens Plan. Kurt Goss' idea is practical and powerful. Bravo, this is what we need to get the rest of the country thinking creatively! It's our time to be INVENTORS, person by person, not just wait for a large company or a government to come up with or enact good ideas.

Paul T. Says:

Sounds like a really great commercial that Mr. Watson has come up with and I have just the time to air such a commercial for millions to see it. Play ONE Commercial During THE SUPER BOWL this year.

jerry thomas Says:

As a young man in grade school i watched in horror as my president was killed on national t.v. this lives in my mind every day when i hear people complane about how bad we have it here in America. shame on those whom think our country should take care of them and kiss their back side and make things (just right) for them.. i have served our nation in the time of need, and i am proud to have done this... now is when our people,of the people should stand to gather and face this problem,say to our people in d.c....(we have had enought of this garbage) we have to stickup for our fellow countrymen and women and for all of our sakes the chrildren which we have raised and the grandkids which will have this great nation after we are all gone. and if anything will work then this nation and all of its people will survive to carry on the greatness for which this nation was founded..

David McAuslan Says:

Mr. Pickens, I'm ecstatic that someone is actually taking a position on this issue. I have been saying for years that we need to become free from foreign oil, but it seems to have fallen on deaf ears. Now is the time for us to be pro-active and to amass popular opinion on this issue. Thank you for taking this approach. The only question that I have for you is, wind power will only address a small portion of the energy needs of this country. What do you plan to do about the rest of our energy needs. Since wind power is what your company is promoting, is this just a promotion for your own company and are we just helping you to line your own pockets, or do you have other programs to help us rid this country of the the evils of oil?

gwenn Says:

i believe that a 'Restoration Plan' is in order, to Improve the Value of Life; we need people more aware of their Environment, more Respectful of their surroundings, more Understanding when it comes to the Safety of all life, more Giving to the committment to improve life, together; more Preprared with the Necessarities that all Humans require..____Humanity First

Richard Karkkainen Says:

There are a lot of logistics to establish in the Pickens Plan. Most of that involves the establishment of transmission lines and transformer stations from the wind corridors to the great cities. In Texas much of this would go through the Hill Country where people take pride in the natural beauty and do not appreciate transmission lines. What I am implying is that it will take time to work out and get approval for the logistics. A necessary bridge to new sources of energy must, in my view, involve the bridge of opening up our oil reserves in Alaska and off the coastal shores.

Michael J. Flanagan Says:

I can vision the Pickens plan as the new rail system of the 21st century. Boone has been down the road, and he's got our attension. The time is right, the younger generation has the mind-set to move this country forward. Mike Flanagan

Robert Bozsan Says:

Boone, you are the man with the plan and Mr. Watson's vision is "right on" and that vision needs to be "brought to life". THIS STORY NEEDS TO BE TOLD! "Stories are important cognitive events, for they encapsulate, into one compact package, information, knowledge, context, and emotion" (Don Norman: "Things That Make Us Smart"). We would welcome the opportunity to tell this important story, but tell it in such a compelling way that it will move people to action. Go to our website and view our work: www.imsproductions.com

Matthew Johnson Says:

Mr. Watson, I couldn't agree more, I think you have a winning strategy there! It is difficult to fully comprehend numbers and impacts and especially the synergy that can result when we combine answers! I love the plan and I too was picturing the verizon commercials even before you mentioned it. I laughed when I got to that part! You know guys and gals, I feel like I am better off by being part of this movement, even if we don't accomplish anything. Why? Because I like to surround myself with intelligent people, and I really enjoy communicating and participating in such a great event like Pickens plan because we have so many brilliant people here. Like Joseph Watson!

Innocent Wodzisz Jr. Says:

I have heard the argument it would take to much and to long to convert gas stations. Forget about gas stations. Lest we forget many of us already have CNG going to our homes! The costly infrastructure is already in place and as convenient as parking our car at home!

MARY HELEN GLENN Says:

In early December, before the vote on bailing out the auto industry, I wrote to my state's Senator, Claire McKaskill, and urged her to push to make conversions to CNG a manditory part of the plan of each auto manufacturer who gets bailout $$$'s to convert a large percentage of their existing trucks to be CNG/gasoline hybrids (it is not feasible for heavy-duty trucks to be electricity/gasoline hybrids). A fairly eimple mechanical job, the parts are available and lots of jobs would be quickly created or at least kept. I pointed out that the IRS could give large rebates to consumers who purchased pickups and larger trucks which were so modified. This makes more sense to me than the tax credits customers currently get for buying E85 vehicles (85% ethanol). To-date I have not received a response from my senator on this topic and $19 billion of the money has already been distributed (news on the radio (PBS) this morning.) We've got to write and write and write our Congress People! Again and again. Keep their feet to the fire! One clarification I'd like to add to "Innocent" above. Yes, most of us do get natural gas delivered to our homes, but it is not COMPRESSED when we receive it. I believe I've heard that the pressure at my meter is less than 10 PSI. In order to go any long distance in a vehicle, the natural gas must be very dense and at a high pressure, perhaps at such a high pressure that it is even liquified. We will need to purchase some type of compressor in order to utilize the natural gas that is delivered to our homes. But the best use of CNG is in our nations trucks and delivery vehicles. Those CNG tanks are really, really big! Maybe another solution is to have the Natural gas distributed in large pressurized tanks to the end user, you know, the way we used to get our morning milk 75 years ago. There already exists a distribution system for LPG (liquid petroleum gas) to many folks who run their heaters in the winter using LPG. So the distribution problem seems minimal to me. These distributors would more than likely love to increase their delivery routes, hire more delivery personnel and make lots more money. I got a pamphlet in 1995 from the Union of Concerned Scientists which gave detailed instructions on how to convert a gasoline powered truck to a CNG/gasoline hybrid (with a switch to enable the use of either fuel, whichever is available.) 1995, it's been around and fairly simple to do for at least the last 20 years. If there had been a $0.30 or $0.40 cent tax on gasoline for the last 20 years, with the money diverted to CNG conversion, we'd already have been there. See why we need to increase the gasoline tax and stop subsidizing petroleum companies!? People will use another fuel when the true price of gasoline must be paid at the pump. We all need to do our research. There are lots of sites on the WEB. So many inventions have been created in the last 40 years that we can already take advantage of! We must educate ourselves and then we can pass the word on to our friends, relatives and acquaintences. First, we must start with conserving and we can do that right now in many, many ways. Then we will have money to spare to buy more and more efficient appliances and vehicles. If it makes sense to keep American dollars in the American economy instead of sending them to the Mid-East and South American oil barons, then why doesn't it make just as much sense to keep my personal dollars in my pocket instead of sending them to the utility companies? If every retired household on Social Security had solar panels on their roofs or their own residential scale wind turbine, then their utility bills would be minimal and it would not hurt them to skip their COLA (Cost of Living Adjustments) for a year or two to pay for the installation of their solar panels. Then, even if their Social Security is smaller for the rest of their lives, their utility bills also, will be reduced for the rest of their lives and the value of their homes will increase. They can live better and Social Security can be saved for everyone! We need to re-think the manner in which we live. No longer can we say "Well, we've never done it that way before!"

Brent Byers Says:

Is there a place to donate $'s to the Pickens Plan for marketing Boone's message? If there is, point me to the right URL. Thanks! Brent Byers

Martin Says:

I really want to see the Obama Administration and the Pickens Plan give more thought to "Water Powered Vehicles". The technology has been around for years but was always suppressed by BIG OIL. Now that we're trying to get away from Foreign Oil, Fossil Fuels, and create a Greener Environment "Water Powered Vehicles" are Americas Future. Let's put money into this technology so we can develop a Convertor for our existing vehicles so they can run off water. Any type of water, Rain Water, Salt Water, Well Water. LET"S GO AMERICA!!!!!

Sam Says:

How about IMS donating or at cost Story of Pickens Plan film? I like the plan and I'm sure there are many partner plans

D Riley Says:

We must stop natural gas drilling until there is a safe alternative to the current process (e.g., hydro-fracturing), and until we can guarantee our health and the safety of the environment are in balance. The new congress and administration will be quick to plug the holes that Cheney, Bush and their cronies were able to sneak through back in 2005. Wind/Solar = fantastic. Natural Gas drilling = disaster

Peter Rowley Says:

We need to be energy independent, period. With today's technology, we are capable of developing all our resources in a safe and enviromental approach. My concern today (Jan 13, 2009) is the energy issue has become muted in recent weeks, ever since gas prices started coming down in price. It appears not only Congress but the general public is forgetful of where we were 6 months ago. Instead of having a departure of money going out of this country, it needs to stay here to be use for developing our energy resources. Peter Rowley

William Says:

I like the ideas presented by Watson and Goss. I'm sure there are others out there with good ideas too. Let's round 'em up and use as many as we can. As I've heard many people say over the years "We can put a man on the Moon and build Space Stations, etc. but, we can't make a car that gets decent mileage? We can't find a less polluting form of energy? We can't find a sustainable form of energy to keep us from the mercy of others? Come on...we're the most Technologically advanced nation on the Earth. We, as a nation appear to have been duped or mislead by the idea that we must depend on someone else for our energy needs. Sure, we need to preserve some of our own resources but we also need to be able to sustain everyday life. For the average person or family, that means transportation to and from a place of employment. Not everyone wants to live in the same area that they work nor, is it possible or even practical in some cases to do so. Sure, you can live without a car. Hundreds of Thousands if not, millions do it every day. They are also dependent on someone or something else for their daily transportation needs. I don't particularly like that idea. We were pitched and sold this idea by automakers for many years. The Oil companies made it happen for us and made some incredibly wealthy in the process. Both, here and abroad. I'd rather our money stay here and benefit our own country. For all the advancements we've made, we still could use some improvement. But, as we saw last year, we're at the mercy of those countries that don't have our well-being in mind or even want it. Coupled with our own business-world greed and lust for huge profit overnight, we became hostages for the very convenience of being able to live where we want, go where we want, and do it when we want. Given our Nation's history of not wanting to be like everyone else and be told how and when things would be done, we have ironically become Energy Hostages. We got this way, by giving in to large corporations including Oil companies, Financial Institutions, and other countries instead of telling the Foreign nations to feed the Oil to their own families and see how far it got them. They might have the Oil but, they have little to no food. Which one can they do without for the longest period of time? My bet is, we can get along without Oil longer than most of them can survive without food. Cruel it might sound but, life can be brutally cruel. Alternative fuels for vehicles have been around for years, there's just not been enough intrest ($$$) in them by the ones capable of making them a practicality for everyday use. Even Germany in WWII managed to make and use synthetic fuels as well as use diesel in a number of their aircraft. For a small country with limited resources, they sure managed to put a lot together in a relatively short time. They were a formidable enemy for several years. Luckily, we were Triumphant. We first have to get rid of the idea that any other fuel is going to have to take the place of Gasoline in Form, Fit, Function, and Economy. Listen closely here...Virtually Nothing is going to take the place of Gasoline in the form of a fill-up and do it with the relative ease and economy that gasoline has given us so far. It's just not possible with our present day mindset. So many are opposed to Ethanol as an alternative to gasoline or even supplement it. Yet, it's at least a step in the right direction along with pursuing every other available form of alternative fuel that we can come-up with. It's better than being held hostage. The mindset has to change. We might have to bear the things that aren't so pleasant to get us less dependent on Foreign Oil such as tapping our own resources no matter where they are located and increased cost, until production costs can be lowered. Just like the first year model of any new car, the price of new cars are never cheap, but the prices always come down after the initial production is started and the sales pick up. It's imperative to our well beingand survival as a Nation that, we become independent as much as possible. We spent a lot of effort money and lives getting the freedoms we have today. All those freedoms that we spent so many years defending the very idea of, could be gone in a lot less time than it took to gain them. We certainly aren't perfect as a Nation but, there's no better place to Live than the United States. Besides, nobody is perfect. There is of course, some common sense to be used here in our energy use and pursuance of alternatives. That seems to be lacking everywhere you look these days. It costs you in some form or another, to Live on this Planet. Daily life is not free. Bring it on Boone! I'm all for getting us off the "Dependency" on Foreign Oil.

Leave a Reply

Sign Up