First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Zip Code:
All fields required.
Why do we want this?
We're asking for your zip code so we know what Congressional District you live in. We're trying to organize people in every district.

At the National Clean Energy Summit - hosted by the Center for American Progress Action Fund - Boone met with 28 key officials including President Bill Clinton, Speaker Pelosi, former VP Al Gore, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and Secretary Chu to talk about the Pickens Plan. Boone says you “saw America at its best today.” Watch the entire summit right now at pickensplan.com/summit. Click here to join the Virtual March.

37 Comments on “National Clean Energy Summit: We did it!”

Richard Scott Barden Says:

mr. pickens would like to make a recommendation for the new smart grid power generation system. the new grid could use the existing right of ways of the interstate highway system and also use state highways also for the delivery system. the federal highway department should call in each state director to washington next week and start planning for each state and how it will interface with each other. if you like this idea please contact my brother whom is a project manager with tetratech engineers in the memphis office. tel. 901-523-9500 or cell 901-355-0752. while listening to the summit on the delayed c-span broadcast that evening it became obivious that the easement and right of way's where starring us in the face after acknowledgeing mr. gore sr. pushing for the national interstate highway system. thank-you, richard barden

Karl Says:

Great little video! =) It's all coming together now... slowly, but surely...

Eric Muench Says:

It's great to see what we all view as Political people, gather to discuss real problems and solutions within our reach in such a positive way.

shela seals Says:

watched the Summit meeting with pride and confidence that big changes can be made in our energy sources! Keep up the good work, Mr. Boone.

Bill Says:

What about nuclear power? It is the way.

Bob Powell Says:

Need to use Natural Gas and Nuclear Power if we are going to Succeed. These are the only two that or economic and efficient today without subsidies. They can delever the soonest and are the most Carbon friendly. Others will take 10,20,30 or NEVER years to be ready. they are supplements at best. Wind sure 10-20% Maybe. Solar Possible 5-10%.

David Lessig Says:

We can no longer afford to delay a comprehensive energy plan to relieve us from foreign energy sources. Besides our wealth of fossil fuels that we must retrieve, alternate sources, such as wind, solar, water, and absolutely nuclear must be agressivlely pursued. If the Three Mile Island accident in March 1979 did not happen, it was not a catastrophe, I was there; we would have nuclear plants sufficient today comparable to the nuclear energy France enjoys.

Gerald McClain Says:

Dont forget the important proven method of using geothermal heat pumps for cooling and heating that an individual can do for his/her home and save 50% on energy cost. We dont have to wait for the grid to develop to do GHPs and save 50% on energy cost. We dont have to wait till solar panels come down in cost to do GHPs and save 50% on energy cost. We do need GHPs now as we wait for the electrical grid for wind turbines and solar panels to come down in price. The sun stores heat in the ground to be used during the winter months and the ground stores cold in the ground to be used later in the summer time when you need air conditioning. Wind turbines and Solar panels require a battery to store energy. GHPs use the stored energy in the ground for heating and cooling. So I want to hear more comments about Geothermal Heat Pumps from our leaders. Perhaps they just dont know!

James Kelly Says:

Boone, Thanks for everything you do! Reading Richard Barden's post above, reminded me of a web site I saw about a world-wide hydrogen superhighway. See it at: http://www.interstatetraveler.us/ The developer Justin Sutton has invented an amazing solution to numerous problems all at once. While it might seem a little far fetched at first glance, I think it is just that sort of the out of the box thinking that we need. I'm sure when John Kennedy spoke about putting a man on the moon, people were disbelieving... If we're going to build something, instead of tearing up the roads, highways and bridges and snarl traffic as we do it, perhaps instead, we build something like this NEXT to the existing infrastructure. I think it's worth a look. Thanks, James

Ray Koeppel Says:

I was able to watch much of the forum and was impressed with the knowledge and understanding of the issues through the comments made by the forum attendees. I learned a great deal myself. I believe the assembly of this body of experts demonstrates that we have the capability of acheiving the Pickens Plan and energy independence. I plan to view the entire forum at this site. However, I was disappointed that there was no committment to action. I heard over and over the statement that "this is what we need to do". I heard this in every political speech over the last 2 years from candidates running for office. This statement DOES NOT GET'R DONE. All of the great ideas and thoughts were left on the table and if there is no call for action it is a waste of time. We must have someone assigned to lead the way. To me the apparent leadership should go to Secretary Chu(?). But someone needs to assemble the action plan and the team to execute it. I pray we do not pass up this great start on bringing about energy independence and drop the ball as we've done in the past. We are out of opportunities. Ray Koeppel

Ken Says:

How about having a windmill company put a windmill on the Washington Mall during the "march". Note: Every year, about 20 to 25 solar powered homes are put on the mall by University students for their annual "Solar Decathalon". Maybe a windmill, a solar power system, a "mini-grid" and a home powered by solar/wind energy on the Mall during the march.

Ken Says:

How about having a windmill company put a windmill on the Washington Mall during the "march". Note: Every year, about 20 to 25 solar powered homes are put on the mall by University students for their annual "Solar Decathalon". Maybe a windmill, a solar power system, a "mini-grid" and a home powered by solar/wind energy on the Mall during the march. ken

Maurice Siler Says:

What about Geothermal free energy to produce electricity with no pollution.

WILLARD GOLDSMITH Says:

Back in the 60's there was a plan for a dam on the Delaware River in Pennsylvania. It was planned to aid in flood controll (which is still a threat) and hydroelectric power generation. Land was bought and condemned for the project. Naturally the people in the area complained loud and long and finally got the project cancelled. All the land became a Federal Park with US Route 209 running through the middle of it. The time is right to resurrect that project in light of the energy situation here in the US. This project no longer affects only the people in PA but the entire country. The land is there. Bought and paid for. I'm sure, if somebody looked hard enough, the plans for the dam could be found in some archive, dusted off and built today. The work could start in a minimal amount of time and we ALL would benefit. Many people would be put to work and the end result would be welcomed by all. I can't believe some polititian hasn't brought this up and taken all the credit for it. LET'S BUILD A DAMN DAM!!!

James Everitt Says:

The Power of GREAT EXPO 2009 Business decision-makers will come to the Global Renewable Energy Advanced Technologies, Summit

Madeleine Lapointe-Millar Says:

Please take a good look at Methane generation as a most efficient, sustainable, clean, two-birds-with-one-stone solution. ONE METHANE DIGESTER ON EVERY FARM! I just can't understand why such an elegant solution is being so consistently ignored! OK, so poop isn't a politically correct subject of discussion - but methane digesters SHOULD be!!!

David Martin Says:

Hello Mr Pickens and Hi guys: Jobs we need, power we need, and green energy is mandated. Mr. Goldsmith is correct when he said that now is the time for more “Hydro dams”. The stimulus money that the government wants to spend to create jobs could not be better spent than building more Hydro dams. This is the only green energy that is cheaper and more reliable than any other energy generation including wind generation. A up to date dam like the ones in my area are unmanned and completely remote controlled. They generate when demand is high usually during the day and the generators become motors when there is little power demand such as during the night time hours when demand is low. During that period the turbines pump the water back into the reservoir to be used again the next time needed. AEP has four of the unmanned dams close to me with one maintenance guy to inspect them all. AEP’s Leesville Lake, VA dam is an example of what I am talking about. Another advantage is the hydro dams can instantly power with unlimited variable Megawatts up to full their load design. But the biggest advantage it has to wind is location. Transmitting electricity for long distances have huge loses and lowers the available current limits the longer the distance is. Hydro can be located almost anywhere in the United States. Most every state will have a suitable site for a Hydro dam. Hydro is free energy from now on, once the initial investment is made. The reservoir makes a great habitat for people and animals alike. Yielding boating and camping sites for all. I cannot believe out of all of the talk President Obama has been talking about green energy and breaking our addition to foreign oil that not one dime was assigned or even mention in all of his packages for the upgrade and the creation of new Hydro power. WIND is very good, Hydro is GRATE!!! David Martin

Lynda Silverstrand Says:

In the face of these very trying times, I am so proud of you Mr. Pickens! You set your sights high but you did it. I am so excited and happy to be part of your army. Lynda Silverstrand

Gary Gunter Says:

I suggest the grid be built along the railroads. -The railroads cover the country quiet efficiently. -The railroads have right-of-ways with space left by the no longer used telegraph lines which formally ran next to the railroad. -As was pointed out at the summit, the land for the railroads was given to the railroads by the Government to aid in first building the railroads,,,,,,,what better place to improve this country than where the very first improvements began.

Danny Hunt Says:

great video T. Boone

bob parnofiello Says:

While having a national grid is good, I believe that President Carter had a plan that gave homeowners incentives for installing solar for heating and also electric on their homes. Insulation and energy saving products were also included. I believe that to keep this nation energy independant we need this program back. Please if you can get Mr. Jimmy Carter on board and find out from him how his program worked. thanks.

Steven P Clausen Says:

What if during the event we a national moratorium on the use of fossill fuels, every one that can don't use their car or car pool or take a bus or walk or bike, turn down their thermostats, turn of lights what ever we can think of to save resoucses and show them that we can do it. I bet foreign oil would be watching us!

Bob johnson Says:

If we're looking for right-of-way for a national grid, it seems to me that we already have a nation-wide grid that people don't want to live nex to - the rail system! Perhaps there's a chance to combine the power grid and the rail system right of way - effectively killing two birds with one stone.

Gary Pickens Says:

Why are we not looking to get off the grid. There is company that manufacturers a solar light pole that stores energy to run the L.E.D. bulbs for days. Think about the cost savings for materials to run transmission lines and to maintain over the years. Solar needs to be explored more like wind. Imagine the energy cost savings to cities using solar light poles? The bulbs will last around 25 years reducing maintenance costs. And theses poles are affordable. Lets think more about harvesting the sun.

Jon Osterholm Says:

That was a kinda lame video. The good things, though, are what Mr. Pickens said: that, quite simply, we need to get away from a dependence on foreign oil. What's tragic is that cash injections for renewable energy have been shoved down our throat in a stimulus plan that is meant to float our economy till it gets back on its own two feet. This was rather than politicians being brave enough to bring real change through legislation that isn't a sucker punch to those having their own personal economic crises. Renewable energy is still highly expensive to realize, which is the reason why there's less of it, and that's in part because we've been all talk and no action since the 1970s when the oil embargo got a wide swath of people truly thinking about wind, solar, etc. I suppose that view offends the far left who attended the Summit, like the bored-to-death Sen. Harry Reid, but if everyone here is a cheerleader, then we aren't going to win the game. The thing is, right here in this comment area there are good ideas of what to do and how to run a new grid than I heard during the Summit (what parts I sat through). Granted, I couldn't hazard sitting through the whole thing again. I had hoped this video was going to wide me a good taste of ideas, not back-patting, so it was near meaningless (sorry, but I'm looking for purpose and opportunity, not happy comment montages, here, and there were only those from Boone in this video). If uncreative, self-possessed politicians are the best we have to lead this thing in the public sector, then it's going to be a very tough road away from foreign oil and toward EFFECTIVE renewable and native energy sources. Shoving tax money at it and other ideas, when the entire planet is suffering financially, seems to me to lower confidence, not raise it, as far as what the U.S. intends to do to prevent a potential long-term depression. It's disappointing. It does not matter what I think, at this rate, about economic choices, but only those who actually have money to invest. I am severely underemployed and have never worked in construction or energy (while I might have to). Who cares what I think? The people with money to invest seem to vote NO every time we do something, right now. Is it pure coincidence that every time Obama speaks, or someone like Dodd comments about how govt is going to take over the banks, that markets or indiv. stocks plummet? By contrast, the few days where no one says something damaging to hope about the economy, the markets either rise or barely drop? Not to a perfect record, but darn close! It's a creepy state of things, this govt tells private sector what to do mentality. Stupid me, I thought we elected our officials to work for us, apparently we've voted them in to tell us what to do. Shame.

Ruth Laurene Howell Says:

I am grateful to God that Boone is being given the credit he deserves in Washington D.C.. Grateful that his plan is being taken seriously and action has begun. Bless you Boone. May you reap the rewards and honors you so well deserve now in your life time and not later. . Laurene Howell

Richard Grabowski Says:

This is excellent, but you are going to have to start talking to your Republican friends if you expect anything to pass the Senate. The Republican Senators sat in unison when the rest of Congress rose to applaud Obama for discussing this issue. They will obstruct this because they see it as a success for the Democrats and government intervention. It is time to take Mitch McConnell by the hand and lead him to the light of energy change. The national energy grid is no different then the program started by President Eisenhower to build the Interstate Highway System. We have benefited from that expenditure for 50 years. Lacking that I suspect we are looking at serious obstruction from the Republicans.

Danny W. Neal Says:

When will the federal government mandate light rail systems nationwide, just as the Federal Interstate Act did in the 1950's. This would create millions of jobs nationwide and create cheaper, efficient modes of travel for commuters. It could start with massive overhaul and reworking of Amtrak, there system is antiquated to say the least. All industrialized nations have had systems in place for years, all the US does is keep adding lanes to the interstates. The light rail systems could use utilize some retro-fitted turbines on top to generate power, advertisements inside and outside would bring in additional revenue. This is way past due for our country.

Patricia M. Fields Says:

My husband Troy Fields is a lifelong builder and continues to study ways to save energy. Here in Texas hot summers require lots of air conditioning. He says that seven feet below the surface of our property the temperature is is a constant 70 degrees and even cooler at a greater depth. Before next summer he is planning to dig a 7' deep trench around our home, install plastic pipe at that level, connect it to the blower on our air conditioner to cool the house naturally without freon. It is a simple solution to high cooling bills in Texas summers. We also built our house with deep porches to shade the interior. If anyone is interested in learning more about this on this website, you can contact us at tlfrecon@aol.net. It is just one more way to reduce energy use in hot weather areas of the country.

Jim McConnell, CPL Says:

The Interstate and state highway systems could also be used for natural gas pipelines, as much of America is under served in this area, making conversion to NG difficult. Pipelines and power lines buried under highway right of ways would generate revenue, thus allowing governments to reduce taxes presently used to build highways and bridges.

Robin Sanders Says:

Boone, I really was proud of the positive comments that you got at the Summit. All of us that have been on board the Pickens Plan can give our selves a pat on the back. But then it is back to work. The voices of the Army ...i.e. the voices of voters...got the politicians attention. I did also notice the little childish behaviour of the group that sat and did not show their support during President's speech. I noticed the 100% non support group that did not vote "yes" on the President's plan to stimulate the economy. The President is working for us and for the changes we voted for. Don't they get it? We know who got us into this mess. On a much more positive note, don't forget to go to www.recovery.gov for the reports on how the stimulus money is spent. It is also interesting to go to the online information at www.whitehouse.gov. President Obama promised us tranparency in government and these websites have much information to that end. I have never been so excited and involved in the working of MY government. I have loved being part of the Pickens Army. Thanks,Boone...and give your wife a thank you for telling you to just go do it when you saw the need for this plan. I'm a transplanted Texas girl up here in New York but I am just so darn proud of you and I think you are very much the equal of those two "Nobel guys".

George Lerg Says:

The current high-power towers are subject to destruction by anyone with cutting tools. I suggest the consideration of using the latest horizontal drilling techniques of the petroleum industry. By going underground, we eliminate this form of attack. Also, by going underground, we avoid the time-consuming and extremely expensive issues of Eminent Domain. We can by-pass rivers, farms, freeways, towns, cities, airports etc. etc. I know the Pickens team can find the right folks to evaluate this idea. Regards, George Lerg District Leader, AZ-04.

Tim Heming Says:

With the current economic meltdown effecting my job as Union Carpenter, building exhibits for a number of auto companies including the big 3 that are in dire straights, I like a lot of Michigan workers will be out of a job. I should have listenend to my gut feeling 20 years ago, and stayed away from the Auto Industry. But I have a choice, I have been interested in alternative energy for 10 years on a serious note, and all of my life just out of curiousity. I set a show in Atlanta about 10 years ago for GM alternitive fuels, in the exhibit they had a 2 1/2 ton GMC stake bed truck powered by LP gas. One of the fire marshall rules for showing a vehicle in a convention center, is that it be nearly empty on fuel. Which at the close of the show, trying to get this vehicle out of the convention center it was out of fuel. Where do you go in Atlanta to fill a LP powered vehicle? That brings us to my point about alternative fuel, be it wind, solar, LP gas or whatever, the oil companies and the oil industry are just not going to sit by and let this become the staple fuel in the United States. Untill jobs are created and secured by workers such as myself, in the field of alternative fuels, (installing wind turbines, solar PV grid systems, converting gas powered vehicles to LP gas) this concept is still just a dream. When the average person starts to benifit from going to alternative fuel and going green, that is when it will take a strong hold on the nation. I want to do all I can to help this cause, I joined the Pickens Plan back in the spring of 08, and want to inform others. We must not give up.

Ronald Kirby Says:

The Plan - Generate electricity from wind and solar conserving the natural gas presently used to generate electricity, we will be free to shift that use to natural gas to power transportation ( mainly trucks ) where it can lower our need for foreign oil. One reason that NG is used in electric generation is for providing peak power. I wonder whether wind and solar will replace that use of NG. Why isn't drilling and exploring for additonal NG reserves mentioned in the Plan? Drilling our vast US resources for NG was not mentioned by anyone at the Summit either. I guess if it was mentioned in the Plan then the particpants at the Summit would have been made up of an entirely different group. This group seemed like a pretty partisan group to me. Today it is reported that VA Gov Kaine has requested that Energy Secretary Salazar remove the VA offshore from leasing and exploration. NG as a bridge just doesn't seem to me getting much serious attention.

Kevin Estis Says:

No on the nuclear for two reasons. 1) the waste issue. do you want it buried in your back yard? why take the chance with all the waste? 2) if you were a terrorist, wouldn't it be a tempting target to crash a plane into a nuclear power plant? just think how many Americans those b@stards could kill. And what if they hit several plants? I don't even wanna think about that....too scary.

John Laberge Says:

I just wanted to add my voice ti the idea of using the highway system idea....Its occurred to me often as I'm driving down highways and roads...I also have often wondered if there wasn't some way to utilize the moving energy of the traffic itself? Or have solar collectors all along our highways? And isn't it about time to consider taking all those vulnerable lines that are constantly being hit by storms and causing huge power outages...How about putting them in some type of strong casement at ground level wherever possible?....I think if the government works with the private sector on our energy dilema, we can solve this problem.

Ronald Kirby Says:

Apparently the Speaker and Senator Reid never read the Plan prior to the Summit re: the replacement of NG presently used to generate electricity with power generated by wind and solar allowing that NG to be used to fuel trucks. The Speaker supports closing of coal power plants and converting them to clean burning NG. Today Green Peace was on the Capitol supporting the same concept. Environmentalist are supporting closing coal plants for new NG plants all over the country. Since coal powers about 50% of electrical generation and the Congress and states like CA refuse to explore additional reserves, I doubt if we are going to have the NG to power trucks. The Cap and Trade policy by the Obama Admin will insure the closure of coal plants. We sure are going to need a lot of wind out there. We do have a lot of wind here in Washington. Pelosi and Reid: Capitol Power Plant Should Switch to 100 Percent Natural Gas Washington, D.C.— Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid sent the following letter today to the Acting Architect of the Capitol, Stephen T. Ayers, asking that the Capitol Power Plant (CPP) use 100 percent natural gas for its operations. The leaders wrote: “The switch to natural gas will allow the CPP to dramatically reduce carbon and criteria pollutant emissions, eliminating more than 95 percent of sulfur oxides and at least 50 percent of carbon monoxide

Leave a Reply

Sign Up