When we first reported for Pickens Plan duty on July 8, 2008, we set out with one goal - reduce our dependence on foreign oil. You may remember Boone’s white board presentation explaining how the whole plan fit together. Two years later, here’s Boone’s update to the presentation.

46 Comments on “Boone goes back to the whiteboard”

Pete Rohrig Says:

I have a couple of questions and coment, What is 1MCF of natural gas? Does anyone know what it costs to convert a diesel engine to NG? Is anyone working on a conversion kit (for lack of a better word)? Has anyone thought of the distribution of NG to assist and ensure a supportable infrastructure? I love the plan, I would like to see the details of your proposal. Pete Rohrig Navarre, Florida 32566

Greg Wilson Says:

Boone, I love your plan. I think you're right on every point except one which is your faith that this President can or will do anything about it. Like you said, he's already wasted two years and I just don't see him (or any other politician) willing to go forward. The only way it will happen is through Free Enterprise. Don't wait for the government to help...it won't happen. Sincerely, Greg Wilson

Joe Florio Says:

I love the plan too, but I believe that for 40 years the oil companies have been making sure they are the only game in town, otherwise we would have other ways of fueling our vehicles today. The question now id will that policy continue, and I think the answer is if we let it. Get mad and stop them US, it's up to US.

Garry M. Bowen Says:

Sir; I have used

Gary R. Anderson Says:

Obama won't use the Pickens plan, since he wants to do it by destroying our productivity with socialism. No problem, he'll be neutralized in November! The Pickens plan IS viable, but is too slow, and doesn't affect OPEC. We must use what's left of the stimulus to make it happen NOW. Next, understand that OPEC has set oil's price at $___/Bbl at their whim by turning the spigot to raise or lower the supply. The ACTUAL cost to get oil is only a fraction of that (some say $4-7/Bbl) US oil companies benefit from OPEC as well, by setting their price at parity with OPEC. Solution: Destroy OPEC! Get the member nations to "compete" (again) --lowering their prices. CNG is one answer, but comparing 1mcf CNG @ $5 to 7gal of diesel @ $21, is only half the story, since CNG doesn't have all the taxes attached to it, --YET! So, WHAT can YOU do NOW -- if Obama won't budge, do an end run around government inefficiency by setting the free market FREE. Enact the FairTax, which will REPLACE the income tax (not add to it) --which takes away the polititians power. THEN, a grassroots campaign will mean something! Watch this 30 min infomercial (in 3 parts) and sign up! to fight on both fronts of the battle. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpXyjtx1eeU -- or logon to YouTube.com

john bogle Says:

Obviously any American watchinng this will want to be on board. Howdo we get around the lobbyists and power of big oil?

Denise Young Says:

Greg is exactly right: this needs to be a Free Enterprise effort. government will NOT lead the way and has already shown us this for 40 years. we need to use (for lack of a better word) the recession/energy crisis/oil spill to excite people about all the positives that will come from implementing Boone's ideas. any more Kevin Costners/Bill Gates around that have great ideas and just need exposure/financial backing??? there's got to be!!

Gary R. Anderson Says:

So, WHAT can YOU do NOW -- if Obama won't budge, do an end run around government inefficiency by setting the free market FREE. Enact the FairTax, which will REPLACE the income tax (not add to it) --which takes away the polititians power. THEN, a grassroots campaign will mean something! Watch this 30 min infomercial (in 3 parts) and sign up! to fight on both fronts of the battle. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpXyjtx1eeU -- or logon to YouTube.com

John Troth, Jr Says:

I think the above comments have it right. Our worst enemy is our own bought and paid for Congress. It has to be "we the people" that gets the job done. First, Boone you have to contact and convince the big oil and gas companies, the ones that have the gasoline stations and pumps to install pumps for nat. gas and to deliver nat. gas to these pumps. Once people can get nat. gas easily they will change over to nat. gas. The U.S. is on the edge of an abyss we will never be able to get out of unless we do this and we do it fast. Thanks, jstjr1

Gary R. Anderson Says:

Mr. Pickens; Would you Please help the FairTax with a donation?

Mark Smolen Says:

First, I'm a fan of the plan--the whole plan. I think this WBP misses a bit because it is leaving out the discussion on wind and the need for a new electrical distribution backbone. I think that moving 20% of our use of CNG from electrical production was a more robust argument that is possible in 8 years than moving away from diesel in 18 wheelers. And it's free enterprise that can make this possible--it's more of a corporate "backbone" or "infrastructure" undertaking. Corporations investing in the wind power and transmission lines to existing power distribution nodes is frankly easier than getting ma-n-pa to buy or convert their truck to CNG. 82% of all trucking companies have 6 or less trucks. They are small companies that will not be able to afford this. I realize we expect govt to pick up some of this cost or incent them to do so (on top of the fuel savings). But the new taxes will be levied on CNG to make up for a revenue loss...so CNG will be more costly than current pricing indicates. Again, I believe the electrical point is an easier battle to fight and I would have liked to seen Boone talk more on this and push the administration to open up the right-of-ways that are needed for electrical transmission.

lee cannefax Says:

Yes sir Mr. Pickens Sir; count me in!!! I sent this out to face book, twitter and my email list; that is about 200 people. I hope everyone else that see’s Boone's whiteboard address will do the same. I have a political viewpoint that I favor, but I am an American first. I pledge to not support any political entity that will not sign on to this plan. At county, state and Federal levels across the board; I believe this is what it is going to take. If my party is not fully commited, I will vote the other way, simple as that. I have been a part of this Army almost since conception and I am proud of it. Boone is an Oil man; my option differs in that we need to get off petroleum dependence; period end of story. That said we have to crawl before we can walk. Boone Pickens has provided us the means to make it happen along with the solar corridor this makes sense, no doubt about it. All the while creating jobs and demonstrating fiscal responsibility.. If this is not a Win / Win, I have not seen one Tell your neighbor, your family and friends; your elected officials, your newspapers and email list.. America all pulling together for the same cause; WOW. Now that's change you can beleive in... (who said that)

John Thompson Says:

Boone--I'm a 68 year old long-time business and environmental writer and author who has watched your Picken's Plan unfold from afar. I was suspicious where you were going with it, but no more. (OPEC oil independence is just the second key reason for reducing oil consumption; the first is human survival). Your White Board presentation clears away all doubts I've harbored. Bravo for you and your organization! Really and truly. Your plan is imminently do-able, and challenging the American public to get off its hands and do its part is exactly what's required to make the plan work. I'm moving off the sidelines and helping from here on out. All things are possible if the American public starts (1) waking up to its ecological best-interest and (2) wielding the awesome power it possesses as consumers in the greatest consumer-driven economy ever devised--John Thompson, Smyrna, Georgia

Tim Morelock Says:

You know why things such as this never come to fruition is that like the politicians that so many claim to despise, so many take a forum such as this and use it for some other selfish desire. I don't come here to talk about politics that has nothing to do with saving America from the downward spiral of oil dependence. Now when you contact your Congressional Representative or Senator, if you want them to listen to you explain that with CNG we can EMPLOY A LOT OF VOTERS QUICKLY, EMPLOY A LOT OF VOTERS QUICKLY, EMPLOY A LOT OF VOTERS QUICKLY, you will get their attention. Nothing else matters this year or any year for that matters so forget non Pickens issues here and we will have a unified front. Considering that CNG currently costs about sixty four cents ($0.64) per gallon compared to a spot market cost of two dollars and six cents ($2.06) for gas we need to get this ball going.

Mark Kesler Says:

I'm curious about how the energy equivalency between Diesel and CNG/LNG looks relative to the physical storage needed for each. Everyone can visualize 3 one-gallon milk jugs full of diesel fuel. If 1MCF of natural gas is Liquified (LNG) or Compressed (CNG) how much space does it fit into?

Bryan Chesebrough Says:

Just checking the numbers. 8 million Diesel Semi's using 2.5 million barrels daily. There are 42 gallons in a barrel of oil. Does that means each 18 wheeler is using only 13 1/8 gallons/day?

larry desaules Says:

Give me a tax incentive and I'll switch my car to CNG in a heartbeat. -Larry

Brad Bannister Says:

CNG is used all over Europe. One of the poorest countries in Europe, Ukraine, has a large CNG tank at nearly every gas station. They run trucks, buses, taxis and private vehicles on CNG. According to every driver I have ever talked to, running their vehicle on CNG costs half or less than using gasoline. It's as easy as pie to switch over. Most of their mechanics sell and install the conversion kits. The large above ground tanks are filled from the same big trucks that haul gasoline. The valves are not complex or expensive, and they don't even get a subsidy or tax credit for conversion or CNG use.

Joe Forgie Says:

"Give me a tax incentive" Is that a tax incentive you are just going to pay for anyway? How about cutting into the multibillion dollar defense budget...is that tax incentive enough for you? The people in this country need to stop always looking for the handouts.

Karen Counts Says:

Mr. Pickens knows how to create a following. I was all for his plan until I watched "GasLand" and saw what natural gas drilling is doing to our domestic water supply. I SAY NO to the Pickens Plan. Watch "Gasland" Any comment Mr. Pickens? Karen

Thomas H. Rosling Says:

How about the mehtane hydride on the ocean bottoms? This may be less expensive tha drilling for gas. The good news is thatthe CH4 wont polute the ocean since it is a gas at surface temps. Think about it. Tom Rosling

larry desaules Says:

I'm for the PP, however: If we develop and use CNG for an OPEC replacement, will all that demand raise the price (for CNG) and our winter heating bills? Thx, Larry

linn Says:

Now we need to come together as a united people and get off the OPEC oil. I know the oil lobby will try to stop it but if we stand united we will get this to happen. Now i know there are always some people that are against anything new because they don't understand it didn't grow up with it like they did with gasoline but we have to get off the OPEC oil.

John A. DeRose Jr. Says:

Mr. Pickens, Have you (or anyone in your organization) done the same kind of numbers crunching as you've demonstrated in the video in regards to home heating oil consumption in the US? I'd be curious to see an analysis of that factor and how it would impact upon our importing of OPEC oil.

coney island kid Says:

Yes weh have to do this. It is 40 years in the waiting. Those that remember waiting in lines in the 1970's for gas realize nothing has changed since then. We still drink all the foreign oil and T Boone Pickens is correct.

Tomlin Coggeshall Says:

Great plan, NG is a huge step forward. Agree with others who say we'd probably be there now were it not for big oil's powerful lobbying efforts, we (the government, the people, somebody!) need to take control of our energy so we can make it domestic, clean (carbon free), and plentiful. NG is a big downpayment toward that and partners well with the ultimate clean fuel, hydrogen.

Douglas Benton Says:

Why don't you run for President?

Lisa Oltmans Says:

Mr Pickens, Please, please run for President in 2012.

Dave Muth Says:

Boone is right. but first get the railroads to convert all diesels to LNG, then give the truckers 3000 lbs extra gross weight for more LNG fuel. then push home fueling for CNG cars.

Joe Jefferis Says:

I love the white board presentation. The NY Times reported some more positive news today that a scaled down energy legislation is coming soon. I'm confident that the PickensPlan supporters will enthusiastically support a quick passage so long as the energy bill includes progress toward eliminating OPEC for our energy equation. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/us/politics/15energy.html?scp=1

J.R. Griffin Says:

What happened to the strudy the WalMart CEO ordered after T. Boone met with his managers?? I am sure the study found that it was not feasiableto convert WalMart's frleet to CNG or LNG because there is no infrustructor to service the delivery trucks once they delivery their cargo.. This is the same reason I do not convert my car to NG; i.e., if I drive to Charles Town to watch a horse rae I can not find a place to refule and return home.. So, my recommendation is that WalMart/Sam's install a NG refueling capability at every store that now sales gas.. That would allow the converted Walmart/SAMs delivery tricks to refuel and return home for another load.. It would also allow me to convert my car and drive to Charles Town whetre I could refuel at the local Sams or WalMart CNG or LNG service station.. The realproblem is not converting 18 wheelers and my family car to CNG but to some how put an infrastructor in place to refuel those converted cars and trucks. J.R.Griffin

Joe Jefferis Says:

I love the whiteboard presentation. Thank you Boone for the excellent information. The New York Times is reporting good news today that a scaled back energy bill is being worked on which should quickly pass... http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/us/politics/15energy.html?scp=1

Gerald Fisher Says:

I don't understand why TB did not specifically address the rest of heavy duty trucks as #2 target. Especially all fleets that return to a central location each night where the infrastructure to fill up with NG would be installed. In my opinion it is a serious mistake to continue to try to include personal autos in the Pickens Plan because this administration is committed to no emission autos and they will not back NG for cars because of its CO2 emission. TB should use the autos use as a card he could give up in exchange for administration agreeing to back the rest of the Pickens Plan. Once the NG infrastructure gets established for NG distribution, the auto industry will slowly start to include NG because it will be cheaper than battery and biofuel.

Michael Vallez Says:

I think that natural gas price will zoom in the coming couple years, and algae biodiesel will beat out natural gas.

John Priester Says:

I enjoyed the presentation

John Priester Says:

It certainly makes sense. However, the missing component is conservation. In 1978 the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) was created to improve the fuel economy for cars sold in America. In 1978 the CAFE for passenger cars was 18 mpg. In 1984 the passenger car CAFE soared to 27mpg. Where it has remained until 2011. In the first 6 years of CAFE, fuel ecomomy improved by 9 mpg. More than 1 mpg per year. In the 26 years from 1984 to 2010 there has been no improvement to CAFE. Yet our auto industry can produce a 6 cylinder car with more horse power than a 1970's V8 muscle car. The 2010 Cadillac CTS has 556 hp. Why does GM produce a car like this? Because Americans will buy it. Americans don't care about fuel economy. We are concerned with comfort

Bob Says:

How about the extreme environmental destruction that extracting NG from shale causes? This process is called fracking and very easily destroys ground water. There is also the problem of the chemicals that are introduced into the ground to extract the gas and water. In wooded areas and forests the NG companies clear cut a minimum of 5 acres for EACH well site whether it produces NG or not. Plus they build gravel roads through pristine forests to get to these locations, which necessitates additional clear cutting of land. Each well site then has large evaporation tanks of toxic chemicals that remain on the site forever, and let’s not forget the football field size waste water (toxic water) evaporation “ponds” built for each well site. NG from shale and the fracking process may produce NG, but it quickly destroys the environment and causes numerous health problems for anyone living near a well. None of this information is given to the poor souls that lease their land to NG companies in order to save their farm or family from bankruptcy. Strongly recommend you watch Gas Land for first had accounts of this business. Gas Land has been on HBO recently, but there may be other outlets to find it.

Robert m wojciechowski sr Says:

I think all the above comments have merit. My concern is like most Americans this Congress will not do anything for this Country that they can not Control. We the American People need to vote in November, and replace the present Congress with Politicians that will work for Us. Than and only than will Congress do what is needed to get us off of OPAC OIL, and with the help of Private Enterprises. Robert Wojciechowski sr

Nick Goldblatt Says:

An Mcf is 1000 cubic feet.

Jack Shortt Says:

The Pickens Plan has been and remains right on target. I have trouble understanding why the free market is not already moving us in the right direction. The price spread seems to jusify the higher cost of the fuel system. Certainly CNG fueled vehicles are cheaper than electric. Boone did neglect to tell us that most of the 18 wheelers are likely to prefer Liguid NG fuel to accommodate long haul trips. That will be a bit more expensive than CNG, but should remain much cheaper than diesel. Fueling stations may be the limiting factor. We have a chicken egg situation here. No trucks > no fueling stations. Build the stations and the trucks will come, build the trucks and the stations will follow. Transmission and distrbution of nat gas will not be a limiting factor. We are already doing it. Unlike the electrical grid, the gas transmission grid exists, and will not limit vehicular use. Cleane Energy, a company started by Boone is already building lots of stations, mostly out west and some in the east at population centers, air ports, shipping terminals etc. Not much help for the big wheelers.....yet. Cleane is selling well over a million gallons gasoline equivalent per year. I doubt that big oil is fighting natural gas, certainly not Shell. They produce lots of it, and they have been buying up reserves in US. They seem to be betting on the Pickens Plan. Incidentally, Chesapeak Energy, the largest US producer of nat gas is planning to export our gas. We have so much domestic nat gas that the producers are shutting in their wells! The stuff is a glut on the market! World leaders in use of nat gas for vehicles include Iran, Pakistan and Peru. The whole world will be on nat gas before wwe get there!!

Glenn H. Snead Says:

Boone, Great presentation. But you missed a few vital points to sell this to trucking companies: 1. Conversion cost per truck 2. Fuel economy: How far can I drive a natural gas powered truck? 3. Natural gas availability: - Can my drivers find this at truck stops? - WHEN can they find natural gas at truck stops? - Will they make it to the next truck stop on natural gas? 4. How does converting to natural gas affect my maintenance costs? 5. What about "fracking?" I've heard it destroys a lot of groundwater. Cover these points in your next presentation and you'll convert a few companies and achieve your 8 million truck goal without Federal intervention.

David E. Bruderly PE Says:

Myth #1: Natural gas is a fossil fuel that destroys the environment. Any industrial activity can cause pollution problems if not conducted properly, even production of advanced lithium ion batteries and biofuels. There is no affordable, perfect solution -- yet. NG creates a pathway to rapid deployment of hydrogen motor fuels that will be needed when fuel cell vehicles are ready for market. And NG-derived Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles will achieve 2050 goals of 80% lower carbon emissions. Myth #2: Fracking will destroy water supplies. The problems with "fracking" can be solved by Congress re-instating the provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act that were revoked by the 2005 Energy Act and by drillers following good engineering practices to conserve, treat, reuse and properly dispose of wastewater. Myth #3: NGVs have performance problems. WRONG. Every other perceived barrier to the widespread use of natural gas as a motor fuel is easily solved by good vehicle design. The CNG Honda Civic GX is the cleanest, mass produced vehicle available today; the only problem is that less than five thousand are made last year. Myth #4: Natural gas vehicles are less efficient. WRONG. NG is 130 octane; an optimized NG engine is more efficient and cleaner than a gasoline engine. Can you say Honda Civic GX? But the real policy objective is not slightly higher efficiency; it is petroleum displacement and reduced pollution. Myth #5: CNG vehicles have reduced range because the fuel storage tanks are too large; a technology breakthrough is required before NGVs are practical. THIS IS TYPICAL FUZZY LOGIC ADVANCED BY DEFENDERS OF THE STATUS QUO. CNG does NOT have a storage problem; vehicle manufacturers have simply failed to design vehicles to accomodate the larger fuel storage space required by compressed natural gas. When a vehicle is sized for gasoline storage, it is difficult to retrofit a larger CNG storage system. This is a VEHICLE DESIGN FAILURE. Type 4 CNG tanks are no heavier than liquid fuel tanks loaded with fuel; larger yes; heavier no. Vehicle weight reduces efficiency, not fuel storage tank volume. Myth #6: There are no NG fuel stations. Any competent engineer / construction company can install a NG fuel station in less than 6 months; but very few businesses can mass produce 100,000 vehicles. Why do auto makers assume that consumers will only buy vehicles that operate on dirty, high-carbon liquid fuels that has ranged in price between $2 and $4 per gallon over the past two years? This is crazy; in other industries the needs of the customer come first. The marketing egg-heads for US automakers have have completely lost touch with the needs of their customers. Myth #7: A Volt plug-in hybrid will cost $40,000; this is crazy. Automakers could easily ramp up production of millions of clean, efficient, affordable multi-fuel vans and pick-ups (added cost would be < $2,500) that empower consumers to choose their preferred motor fuel at the pump. E85 for $3/gge in Iowa; CNG for $1.89/gge in Florida.

Garth Saalfiled Says:

I'll try to keep this to 1 question: GAS TOWN? We need to start, develope and finalize what the environmental issues are and how those issues can be dealt with. How about it T. Boone? Can we get around these issues? Because they cannot be swept under the rug and kept there. Too many people ( us ) involved. Let's come 'Front

Paul SADLER Says:

I saw and heard Mr. Pickens give his white board presentation a couple of years ago. The plan featured both wind energy and natural gas. I watched as he promoted wind energy to build the "Pickens Army". Today I see his update and it is all about natural gas, no mention of wind energy for electricity. Most of you signed up as result of a tv campaign featuring wind - are you aware that the interests of natural gas are fighting the development of wind energy in every regulatory body?

Missy Steichen Says:

Pete Rohrig, 1 MCF is the energy equivalent of 7 gallons of diesel fuel. I hope that answers your question. Please help us PUSH the Pickens Plan... Contact your elected officials and tell them to support HR 1835 and 1408. America's future, new jobs and energy independence depend on a new energy plan! Missy : - )

David Powell Says:

Best responsible, patriotic plan going, but how to get the nation to demand action-that's the million-dollar question. Pockets, yes-I think that is the key. Money-nothing gets people more motivated than money in their pockets. Sad, but true. Boone implements a stock or company that we can invest in with our meager devalued dollars. Then the people of influence like you will come and our pathetic politicians will respond.

Leave a Reply

Sign Up

First Name
Last Name
EmailZip
25423 Followers