First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Zip Code:
All fields required.
Why do we want this?
We're asking for your zip code so we know what Congressional District you live in. We're trying to organize people in every district.

The Wall Street Journal on the 100 Year Supply of Natural Gas

A major article in the Wall Street Journal echoes what T. Boone Pickens has been saying for nearly a year: There is enough natural gas under the continental United States to serve all of our needs for upwards of 100 years.

The piece is headlined: “U.S. Gas Fields Go From Bust to Boom” and is written by reporter Ben Cassleman who follows oil and gas issues for the Journal.

He writes about the Haynesville Shale Field under Louisiana which

could hold some 200 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. That’s the equivalent of 33 billion barrels of oil, or 18 years’ worth of current U.S. oil production. Some industry executives think the field could be several times that size.

Casslelman writes what Boone has been saying in Town Halls, on TV, radio and newspaper interviews:

Huge new fields also have been found in Texas, Arkansas and Pennsylvania. One industry-backed study estimates the U.S. has more than 2,200 trillion cubic feet of gas waiting to be pumped, enough to satisfy nearly 100 years of current U.S. natural-gas demand.

The discoveries have spurred energy experts and policy makers to start looking to natural gas in their pursuit of a wide range of goals: easing the impact of energy-price spikes, reducing dependence on foreign oil, lowering “greenhouse gas” emissions and speeding the transition to renewable fuels.

We know that, in spite of the recession, we are still importing nearly two-thirds of the oil we use. The Journal story confirms,

The U.S. is increasingly reliant on supplies imported from the Middle East and other politically unstable regions. In contrast, 98% of the natural gas consumed in the U.S. is produced in North America.

Casselman points out that new drilling technologies, first developed for the Barnet Shale deposit in Texas, have led to the new estimates of vast natural gas reserves in the United States.
The article takes particular note of Boone’s work with the Pickens Plan

The growing supply created opportunities for policy makers and environmentalists, who saw natural gas as a possible solution to the nation’s energy problems. Some groups suggested burning more gas and less coal for power generation. Others favor its use in vehicles.

Mr. Pickens has spent millions promoting an energy plan that aims to, among other things, convert thousands of big-rig trucks to run on natural gas. Mr. Pickens has large investments in natural gas and stands to benefit if his plan is adopted. In TV ads, Internet videos and speeches, he emphasizes a different goal: reducing U.S. dependence on foreign oil.

The dual message of energy security and environmental responsibility has helped Mr. Pickens win powerful allies, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and dozens of elected officials from both parties. A bipartisan bill providing tax incentives for natural-gas cars looks likely to pass this year.

To read the entire article, click HERE.

– The Pickens Team

Comments3 Responses to “The Wall Street Journal on the 100 Year Supply of Natural Gas”

Natural Gas For America


This is an exciting and great article. Natural gas is power we can count on. Curious to find out down the road if the experts have underestimated the amount of natural gas found in the Haynesville Shale. One thing missing in this article is mention of a junior independent oil and gas exploration, development and production company called Mainland Resources Inc. (www.mainlandresources.com) that is playing with the big boys in the shale play in Louisiana. C. Keddy www.naturalgasforamerica.com

Mark Bremer, NY 25th District Leader


I think it is a major misrepresentation to say the supplies of natural gas under our lands are enough to supply ALL of our energy needs for upwards of 100 years. The article says 2,200 cubic feet of gas is enough to meet our CURRENT gas needs for NEARLY 100 years. Nowhere does it say that our gas needs are in fact increasing each year. Doesn't it follow that if we're using the resource more rapidly each year, it won't last as long as using the same amount year after year? Plus, the whole point of the article was suggesting that we should tap into this great resource and use it even faster! This cherry-picking of facts out of context is misleading because it gives us a false sense of security that our energy problems can be solved just by using more natural gas. It is also dangerous because we are trying to formulate a new energy policy based on using natural gas to power more of our vehicle fleet. The reality is we will be increasingly dependent on a fuel which has supplies being used at a faster rate. Should we even trust the INDUSTRY FIGURES telling us everything is going to be fine if we just use more of their natural gas? We have heard this argument before about oil and there is no escaping the reality of exponential consumption of a finite resource. Everyone should read the article link below about the forgotten fundamentals of the energy crisis. http://www.npg.org/specialreports/bartlett_index.htm

John T


Interesting, we have 100 years of natural gas. Does that mean we go burn it all up? I know people don't care much about future generations, but considering this is a very valuable resource and could help us if we ever get into an oil crisis like the 70's, I would suggest we consider conserving it, using it wisely.

Leave a Reply

Sign Up